Comments on: Continuous Integration with Hudson http://www.ericfeminella.com/blog/2008/10/18/continuous-integration-with-hudson/ Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:49:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Ivan http://www.ericfeminella.com/blog/2008/10/18/continuous-integration-with-hudson/comment-page-1/#comment-127178 Ivan Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:47:44 +0000 http://www.ericfeminella.com/blog/2008/10/18/continuous-integration-with-hudson/#comment-127178 Hi Eric, great post, we are starting to run CI with flex tests using Fluint for testing rpc interaction with server and integrated them with Cruise Control. We tried using Flex Unit, since it was basically the standard in the market, but we found out that testing async calls (as all rpc's are) isn't that straight forward in Flex Unit.. for now very happy with fluint... don't know if you have another suggestion. Thanks Hi Eric, great post, we are starting to run CI with flex tests using Fluint for testing rpc interaction with server and integrated them with Cruise Control. We tried using Flex Unit, since it was basically the standard in the market, but we found out that testing async calls (as all rpc’s are) isn’t that straight forward in Flex Unit.. for now very happy with fluint… don’t know if you have another suggestion. Thanks

]]> By: david deraedt http://www.ericfeminella.com/blog/2008/10/18/continuous-integration-with-hudson/comment-page-1/#comment-127105 david deraedt Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:30:30 +0000 http://www.ericfeminella.com/blog/2008/10/18/continuous-integration-with-hudson/#comment-127105 I was actually wondering if Hudson was worth trying. Now, I guess it is ;) Thanks ! I was actually wondering if Hudson was worth trying. Now, I guess it is ;)

Thanks !

]]>